Archive for the ‘Hadron Thoughts’ Category

Hadron the Collider at the Trash Bar This Wednesday

Sunday, July 4th, 2010
Hadron the Collider will be playing with some cool bands this Wednesday, July 7th at 8pm! $6—open bar! It’ll be a fun show for sure!
The Trash Bar
www.thetrashbar.com
256 Grand St. between Driggs and Roebling
Williamsburg, Brooklyn NY 11211

Hadron the Collider Plays the Make Music New York Festival on Monday!

Saturday, June 19th, 2010

We were very excited to be chosen to take part in this annual event.  Make Music New York is a one day music festival that… well, let’s let the New Yorker describe it:

“An eleven-hour escapade of musical creativity.” – The New Yorker

From the Make Music New York website:

“Make Music New York is a live, free musical celebration across the city that takes place each June 21 — the longest day of the year.

On that day, hundreds of public spaces throughout the five boroughs — sidewalks, parks, community gardens, and more — become impromptu stages for over 1,000 free concerts. Musicians of all ages, creeds, and musical persuasions perform for new audiences, who come out from under their headphones to hear unfamiliar groups risk-free on the first day of summer.”

If you are out and about in Greenpoint on Monday, June 21st at 6PM, come over the McGolrick park to listen to Hadron the Collider and other great bands play for fun and to celebrate the first day of summer!

Principals of New Media (and our Education System)… So Far

Tuesday, April 6th, 2010

My wife teaches at a Harlem high school.  I’m constantly amazed when she brings home poster boards and overhead projector transparencies that she uses in her lessons to educate high school students.  Chalk?  Do teachers really still use chalk?  Should they be still using chalk?  I’m not belittling her profession or the financial limits her industry is restricted by but if we continue to educate our children in this manner we shouldn’t be surprised that we are graduating unprepared young adults into the private sector.   We will only ever get what we are willing to pay for.

(more…)

Old Media Sucking Up to New Media

Sunday, April 4th, 2010

It’s interesting that in only a few short years the “Old Media vs. New Media” debate has already become a tired old trope of web hacks and cable news talk shows.  “The newspapers are dying, magazines are disappearing and Web 2.o is killing journalism,” come the cries of the print and television citizenry.  The “debate” tends to focus on a perceived contrast between one form of media and the other.  It presents a dichotomy that quite frankly, does not exists.  There is no Old Media vs. New Media bifurcation.  There’s only overlap and adoption, and a sort of Hegelian media dialectic.  Who among us only uses New Media and not Old?  Hell, even I just had to grab my hardback copy of Roget’s Thesaurus when dictionary.com failed to pull up another word for ‘dichotomy’.

(more…)

Things Women Don’t Know About Men

Saturday, April 3rd, 2010

My classmate (and fellow blogger), Laniemoetz recently blogged at live, love, learn, laugh about those ubiquitous “10 Things” lists common to grocery-store magazines such as RedBook and Maxim.  She created her own version of the list called, Things Men Don’t Know About Women and challenged her readers to come up with their own.  Well, Lainemoetz… you asked for it!

(more…)

Something Gonzales

Friday, March 19th, 2010

Friday March 19th, 8:30am, on a Southbound E train between 34th and 23rd, someone announced over the dying old man of a public address system that it was something something (couldn’t make out what that guy said) Gonzales’ last day on the job. After 30 years of dedicated service to the MTA, he’s retiring. Congratulations Something Gonzales. I half hoped, pictured in my mind, all of us vacant commuters, in every train car, standing and cheering for Something Gonzales. I pictured this joyful, ridiculous, inspirational commercial in my head. Nobody moved. No one reacted. The moment to celebrate was gone. The reading and staring and thinking and music and thinking some more went on uninterrupted. We don’t expect to make out much of what’s said on those subway PAs. We’ve all been frustrated by that garbled trick. And, on the rare occasion that we do understand, our backpacks are subject to search. So, Something Gonzales goes un-thanked by his passengers. Maybe we were all jealous, all on our way to work again, and on such a beautiful upper 60s day. Enjoy your retirement Something Gonzales. Thanks for the ride.

Physicalism for the Non Physicalist – III

Thursday, March 18th, 2010

A strong physicalist theory needs to account for not only the physical aspects of objects but also the conceptual nature of everyday experience. There is nothing physical about ethics or our shared social values. There is nothing tangible in the idea of two people conversing (apart from the sound waves generated by air from their lungs passing over their vocal cords). There is, however a relationship between these more abstract ideas and physical objects. Physical and mental levels of existence are interdependent so that if there is a change to one, there is always a change in the other. Supervenience establishes this relationship between mental and physical events. Events have certain properties attributed to them. They occur at a particular time and place, and they consist of certain objects. Instances of physical and mental events must be initiated by a material objects. Therefore, mind-brain identity theory in general is almost universally understood to be a type physicalism theory and not a token physicalism theory. (Kim, pg. 104) This is because of the inherent limitations of token physicalism. Token physicalism asserts nothing more than that mental events “tokens” and physical event “tokens” are instantiated by the same physical event. Because it does not equate them, there is no reason to suppose mind-body supervenience. There doesn’t have to be a specific and reductive relationship between physical and mental events. Mental properties can be free from physical events. Token physicalism doesn’t even address how to explain a mental event. Therefore mental events are unbounded by the physical realm and can have any property imaginable. Rocks can be conscious. Bacteria can have minds. The whole idea of physicalism, according to Kim, is that it must explain mental events in terms of physical events. At the least, it must include a form of mind-body supervenience. Neuroscience relies on this assumption and bases its progress on the fundamental idea that there is an absolute connection between mental and physical events. (Kim, pg 105) Token physicalists, like dualists, reject this connection as a fact and do not believe in the form of reductionism that is entailed in type physicalism. Type physicalists insist that “no Cartesian mental substance” is necessary and that there are no mental facts “over and above physical facts.” (Kim, pg. 105)
(more…)

Physicalims for the Non-Physicalist – II

Friday, March 12th, 2010

Psychoneural Identity Theory, or identity theory, posits that any mental event is equal to a neural occurrence, or some physical event, inside the brain.  Jaegwon Kim describes two ways to define what an “event” is.   Token physicalism views events as discrete “particulars of the world, along with material objects.” (Kim, Philosophy of Mind, Chapter 4, pg. 101)   In token physicalism, a specific mental event “kind” also has a specific physical event “kind”.  For example, the action of a hammer hitting my hand is painful, and the painfulness is equal to both the pain itself and the firing of C-fibers in my brain.  A second way to define an event is with type physicalism, which states that mental event kinds are equal to physical event kinds and vice versa.  Therefore, the hammer hitting my hand is painful, and painfulness is the same as the C-fibers firing in my brain.  From this example, it can be shown that type physicalism necessitates token physicalism but token physicalism has no need for the specificity offered by type physicalism.  In other words, token physicalism doesn’t actually necessarily mean that the pain I’m feeling is the C-fibers firing, like type physicalism does, it only says that for the particular event of pain that I am feeling, there is the pain and there is also the C-fiber firing.  This caveat of token physicalism is what opens the door to dualism and is ultimately why it fails the minimum requirements of a physicalist identity description.

(more…)

Physicalism for the Non Physicalist – I

Sunday, March 7th, 2010

It is no great statement to claim that the human intestinal bacteria known as helicobacter pylori doesn’t have mental states. However, under close inspection, h. pylori can be seen moving towards food, i.e., hydrogen produced in the duodenum. It has also been observed moving away from harm, by tunneling into the intestinal wall in order to move to where the acidic levels of the intestines are lower. To the casual observer, this “moving toward food” behavior and “moving away from harm” behavior might be seen as a sort of awareness – a conscious decision made by the bacteria based on the wish to survive. To a trained scientist however, it’s all a matter of physics. Instead of an ephemeral “mind,” there are chemical reactions occurring within the h. pylori that “reward” the bacteria based on environmental stimuli. For each behavior event, there is a corresponding physical event occurring inside the bacteria. (more…)

Time and Rye

Sunday, October 25th, 2009

It’s cold and dry. The rye is wet and warm. My hands will be cracking soon and the subway will feel less jungle, more dungeon, full of stone and steel and water dripping from somewhere again. Time between time gets shorter again. It starts and stops. The world spins like an old netflix movie. Sometimes it just doesn’t work. No red envelope, return postage paid, a new one in 3 days. This turnaround takes all year as it brags ownership with wind and rain. The rye stays faithful and the warmly dressed voices sound further away. 10 minutes more, and time starts again. I’ll take my flaming breath with me til we meet again my time.